Search

Key Lawmaker Proposes Full Funding For Defense, Short-Term CR For Non-Defense

Key Lawmaker Proposes Full Funding For Defense, Short-Term CR For Non-Defense

With Congress still trying to reach a fiscal year 2018 budget agreement, Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.), chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, has proposed legislation (H.J.Res. 124) to fully fund defense for the rest of the fiscal year.The measure, introduced Dec. 13, would provide $664.1 billion for defense, or about $28.4 billion above the Trump administration’s request. The total includes the $658.2 billion that the House approved in July for base defense funding and overseas contingency operations (OCO), plus the…

Subscriber-only content. Please log in below.

Not a subscriber or registered user yet?

Please contact us at clientservices@accessintel.com or call us at 888-707-5814 (Monday – Thursday 9:00 a.m. – 5:30 p.m. and Friday 9:00 a.m. – 3:00 p.m. ET.), to start a free trial, get pricing information, order a reprint, or post an article link on your website.



Congress Updates

CBO Says Upfront Costs To Protect Military Installations From Drones Between $1 Million And $74 Million

The initial costs to acquire and deploy counter-small unmanned aircraft system (C-sUAS) defenses at individual Defense Department installations are estimated at between $1.2 million and $73.6 million depending on the […]


House Heads For Recess Without Moving On NDAA After Procedural Vote Fails

The House will leave for the Fourth of July recess without moving forward on its $1.15 trillion fiscal year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), with a procedural vote to […]


Bipartisan Group Of House Members Introduce U.S.-Ukrainian Co-Production Bill For Unmanned Systems

A bipartisan group of six House legislators have introduced the Strategic Unmanned Systems Partnership Act–a bill to improve drone collaboration between the U.S. and Ukraine. Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), the […]


Will $4 Billion For SB-AMTI/Space Data Network Backbone In Supplemental Reduce Or Add To Planned Funding For Systems In Reconciliation?

Nearly all of the Department of the Air Force’s fiscal 2027 procurement and research and development (R&D) budget for space-based air moving target indication (SB-AMTI) and the Space Data Network […]

Key Lawmaker Proposes Full Funding For Defense, Short-Term CR For Non-Defense

With Congress still trying to reach a fiscal year 2018 budget agreement, Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.), chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, has proposed legislation (H.J.Res. 124) to fully fund defense for the rest of the fiscal year.

The measure, introduced Dec. 13, would provide $664.1 billion for defense, or about $28.4 billion above the Trump administration’s request. The total includes the $658.2 billion that the House approved in July for base defense funding and overseas contingency operations (OCO), plus the $5.9 billion the Trump administration requested in a budget amendment in November to defend against North Korean ballistic missiles, repair damaged ships and increase troop levels in Afghanistan. CAPITOL

The legislation would block automatic defense spending cuts that are slated to take effect in January under the Budget Control Act of 2011.

“Funding national defense is a top priority, especially in these uncertain times of instability around the globe,” Frelinghuysen said in a statement. “Our troops and commanders must have the resources they need right now to advance peace and our nation’s interests abroad.”

His proposal also would keep the rest of the federal government running at FY 2017 funding levels under a continuing resolution (CR) that would last until Jan. 19. The CR that currently funds the government expires Dec. 22.

Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-Texas), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, welcomed the legislation, saying there is a “bipartisan consensus on the depth of our military’s readiness crisis and the resources required to begin to fix it.”

But the proposal’s fate in Congress is unclear, as Democrats have insisted that full defense funding not move forward without a similar arrangement for non-defense spending.

“Opponents of this bill argue that we should put our urgent national security needs on hold until we reach a similar consensus on a whole host of other domestic programs,” Thornberry said in a statement. “That is the approach we have taken for the past six years and the results are indisputable: the number of our troops killed in training accidents is increasing, our military capabilities are eroding, our enemies have become emboldened, and America is less secure. To continue to use defense funding as a political football in the face of these undisputed consequences is irresponsible.”