Top U.S. Air Force officials are standing behind a significant increase in funding the service is proposing for its controversial Long Range Stand-Off (LRSO) nuclear cruise missile for fiscal 2018.There seems to be “broad bipartisan support for LRSO,” Gen. Stephen Wilson, Air Force vice chief of staff, said Thursday at a Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies breakfast on Capitol Hill.The Air Force's latest budget request would ramp up development work on the program, granting it $451 million – up significantly…
The U.S. Space Force (USSF) plans to request nearly $1.5 billion for the Space Data Network (SDN) Backbone in a future fiscal 2027 reconciliation bill. Last week, Space Force’s Space […]
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Sen. Timothy Sheehy (R-Mont.), two members of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), are renewing their call for “Right to Repair” language in the National […]
The House Armed Services Committee’s (HASC) fiscal year 2027 defense policy draft bill aims to restrict the Navy’s use of unmanned surface vessels (USV) until it decides on key factors […]
A draft defense policy bill released this week says the Army is fielding counter-drone capabilities for defense of fixed sites and maneuver forces but suggests that troops at the lowest […]
Top U.S. Air Force officials are standing behind a significant increase in funding the service is proposing for its controversial Long Range Stand-Off (LRSO) nuclear cruise missile for fiscal 2018.
There seems to be “broad bipartisan support for LRSO,” Gen. Stephen Wilson, Air Force vice chief of staff, said Thursday at a Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies breakfast on Capitol Hill.
The Air Launched Cruise Missile would be replaced by LRSO. Photo: Air Force.
The Air Force’s latest budget request would ramp up development work on the program, granting it $451 million – up significantly from the $95.6 million it is currently receiving.
In fiscal 2017 the Air Force will expand office staff, facilities, and infrastructure in preparation of technology maturation and risk reduction phase, according to the service’s budget documents. Fiscal 2018, activities will include aircraft integration operations to ensure the weapon could be carried by B-52, B-2, and B-21 bombers, as well as test activities and support for design validation.
“This capability is absolutely essential,” Wilson said, adding that the Air Force is prioritizing funding for the program and “we will continue to advocate for it.”
The LRSO will replace the aging air-launched cruise missile (ALCM) and is expected to be fielded by 2030. Some lawmakers are pushing back on the program, arguing its conventional and nuclear capabilities increase the risk of miscalculation by adversaries; Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) in March introduced legislation that would limit funding for the weapon at 2017 levels until Congress reviews the new administration’s Nuclear Posture Review now underway and expected to be completed this year. The bill remains in the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Gen. Robin Rand, commander of the Air Force’s Global Strike Command, said Thursday at a House Armed Services strategic forces subcommittee hearing that the LRSO is “not a new capability, it’s an improved capability over the ALCM that we currently have.”
Rand said he has seen no indication of a delay in the acquisition process for the TMRR phases of the LRSO and Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD) programs – the latter is another big-ticket item that will replace the decades-old Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile, to be deployed in the late 2020s.
The GBSD program would receive $216 million in the Air Force’s budget request, up from the current $114 million. Boeing [BA], Northrop Grumman [NOC], and Lockheed Martin [LMT] have confirmed bids for the GBSD contract; Lockheed has also said it was bidding for LRSO.
The Air Force plans to award up to two contracts at the end of this fiscal year for each program’s advanced development phase. The service requested a total of $183 billion for fiscal 2018, an increase from the current $171.2 billion.
The House Armed Services Committee (HASC) wants a closer look at the Army’s Soldier Borne Mission Command (SBMC) effort, citing support for the development program while expressing caution to avoid […]