Search

Jurors Decide for Dallas Ammunition Maker in Dispute with Employee

Jurors Decide for Dallas Ammunition Maker in Dispute with Employee

Bradley lawyers Mark Torian and Sawyer Neely win take-nothing verdict on behalf of United Stand 1 Armory

PR Newswire

DALLAS, July 1, 2019 /PRNewswire/ — Jurors in a Dallas County District Court delivered a verdict in favor of ammunition maker United Stand 1 Armory LLC, ordering a former employee to pay attorneys’ fees after losing his suit to claim an equity stake in the company.

The dispute dates to 2015 when defendant Michael R. Cooper, a competitive shooter and former employee of the privately held Dallas company, sought a 35 percent equity stake and share of the company’s profits. He and the company had several discussions about signing a contract, but never reached agreement.

The evidence showed that negotiations between the company and Mr. Cooper deteriorated, culminating in a demand from Mr. Cooper for significant compensation from the company. To protect its assets and operations, United Stand 1 Armory sought and won declaratory relief that a letter of intent the two parties signed was not an enforceable contract.

In a countersuit, Mr. Cooper claimed the proposed agreement he drafted was an enforceable contract entitling him to a stake and percentage of the business. Mr. Cooper also brought a number of additional claims, seeking over $2 million in damages.

The jury decided against Mr. Cooper and awarded the lawyers for United Stand 1 Armory up to $70,000 in attorneys’ fees.

“Stand 1 repeatedly tried to provide Mr. Cooper with a fair proposal by which he could become a stakeholder in the company. Unfortunately, Mr. Cooper was driven by sheer greed,” said Bradley attorney Mark E. Torian, who along with E. Sawyer Neely, represented United Stand 1 Armory. “Stand 1 stood by its principles and refused to bend to Mr. Cooper’s improper demands. We are proud to represent clients facing such difficult circumstances, and we are pleased that a Dallas jury delivered a verdict protecting Stand 1,” added Mr. Neely.

The case is United Stand 1 Armory, LLC and Anthony R. Miglini v. Michael R. Cooper, Cause No. 17-11549-D, in the 95th Judicial District Court in Dallas County before Judge David Evans.

About Bradley

Bradley combines skilled legal counsel with exceptional client service and unwavering integrity to assist a diverse range of corporate and individual clients in achieving their business goals. With offices in Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and the District of Columbia, the firm’s over 500 lawyers represent regional, national and international clients in various industries, including financial services, healthcare, life sciences, real estate, construction, technology, energy, insurance, and entertainment, among many others.

Contact:

Mark Annick

800.559.4534

mark@androvett.com

Social Media: @bradleylegal, #legalnews

Cision View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/jurors-decide-for-dallas-ammunition-maker-in-dispute-with-employee-300878858.html

SOURCE Bradley Law Firm



Congress Updates

Senators Push Navy Against Single Destroyer Request In FY ’27

The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) and the two senators from Maine last week pushed back on Navy officials for only requesting one Arleigh Burke-class destroyer (DDG-51) […]


Navy Looks To Eventually Assemble Battleship At HII Newport News; Faces More Dem Opposition

The Navy told lawmakers this week it found a dry dock at HII’s [HII] Newport News Shipbuilding shipyard it thinks can use for final assembly of the new Trump-class battleship […]


Navy Leaders Downplay Looking At Foreign Navy Shipbuilding Amid Lawmaker Objections

The Navy’s top leaders this week seemed to downplay and back down on the service potentially using foreign shipyards to build U.S. Navy ships or buying foreign designed warships overseas […]


Senate Defense Appropriators See ‘Risk’ With Army’s Reconciliation Plan To Fund Munitions Increase

The Senate’s top defense appropriators cited concern this week with the Army’s request to fund the majority of its large increase to munitions procurement in fiscal year 2027 through the […]