The United States should agree to negotiate a global ban on weapons in space and the use of anti-satellite weapons, because erecting a military shield to defend satellites would be technologically daunting and far too costly, academics argued today. But they concede that such a ban would not prevent any nation that wished to attack a satellite from doing so. Their comments came at an afternoon forum on Capitol Hill organized by the American Association for the Advancement of Science…
Recommended
Trending
Congress Updates
‘Theoretical Potential’ to Achieve 1,509 Combat-Coded Fighters by 2035, USAF Says
In the latest U.S. Air Force fighter force structure report submitted to Congress, the service speaks of a “theoretical potential” to achieve a goal of 1,509 combat-coded fighters in the […]
Hegseth Pushes For Reconciliation With At Least $350 Billion For Defense ‘Regardless’ Of Midterms Outcome
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Wednesday the Trump administration plans to continue its push for at least $350 billion in defense funds via the reconciliation process “regardless of what happens […]
Bipartisan Push in Senate to Hasten Export of 155 mm, GMLRS, HIMARS for Ukraine
A small, bipartisan group of senators is backing the Fast Tracking European Investment in Ukraine’s Defense Act, S. 5175, to hasten the export of allied buys of U.S. munitions for […]
Rep. Himes Signals Increased Contractor Oversight, if Democrats Win House
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, plans to increase the committee’s contractor oversight if the Democrats win control of the House […]
Job Feed
-
Senior/Principal R&D Systems Engineer, Electronic Warfare, Onsite
Sandia National Laboratories - Albuquerque, NM -
Senior/Principal High-Risk Embed Securty Professional, Onsite
Sandia National Laboratories - Albuquerque, NM -
Senior Business Development Manager
Arnold & Porter - Boston, MA -
Business Development Manager
Arnold & Porter - , NY