The United States should agree to negotiate a global ban on weapons in space and the use of anti-satellite weapons, because erecting a military shield to defend satellites would be technologically daunting and far too costly, academics argued today. But they concede that such a ban would not prevent any nation that wished to attack a satellite from doing so. Their comments came at an afternoon forum on Capitol Hill organized by the American Association for the Advancement of Science…
Recommended
Trending
Congress Updates
HASC Wants Info On Army’s Plans To Pursue Autonomous Aerial Delivery, Surface Vessels For Logistics
The House Armed Services Committee (HASC) added several measures to its version of the next defense policy bill seeking more details from the Army on efforts to develop future logistics […]
McConnell: “Safe To Conclude There Will Not Be A Third Reconciliation Bill”
Two top GOP senators on the Senate Appropriations Committee are opposing a third reconciliation bill. The Trump administration’s total $1.5 trillion fiscal year 2027 defense request is split between $1.15 […]
HASC’s Final FY ‘27 NDAA Expands Systems Eligible For Multi-Years, Includes LTAMDS, IBCS, ARRW
House defense authorizers added a measure to their version of the next defense policy bill that would expand the list of weapons platforms eligible for multi-year contracts, to include the […]
HASC Bill Would Allow Air Force To Buy More Than 267 F-15EXs
The House Armed Services Committee’s (HASC) fiscal 2027 defense authorization bill would allow the Air Force to buy more than 267 F-15EX fighters by Boeing [BA] and would extend the […]
Job Feed
-
Admissions and Records Officer (CS26-268)
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville - Edwardsville, IL -
Title Red Hat Linux Engineer
CommIT Enterprises - Quantico, VA -
Weather Forecaster/Observer-Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
RedTown Technical Services, LLC - Norman, OK -
Industry Engagement Analyst
Anser - Arlington, VA