Search

Global Aerospace Testing Industry Insights, 2014-2025 – Major Providers are Airbus, Boeing, NTS, SGS, Mistras, Innertek, Exova, MTS, Cincinnati Sub-Zero, and Dayton T Brown

Global Aerospace Testing Industry Insights, 2014-2025 – Major Providers are Airbus, Boeing, NTS, SGS, Mistras, Innertek, Exova, MTS, Cincinnati Sub-Zero, and Dayton T Brown

PR Newswire

DUBLIN, March 23, 2020 /PRNewswire/ — The “Aerospace Testing Market Report: Trends, Forecast and Competitive Analysis” report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com’s offering.

Research and Markets Logo

The global aerospace testing market is expected to reach an estimated $5.7 billion by 2025 with a CAGR of 1.8% from 2020 to 2025.

The future of the global aerospace testing market looks promising with opportunities in commercial/regional aircraft, business jets, helicopters, and military aircraft. The major drivers for this market are increasing aircraft deliveries, adoption of new materials in aircraft, and stringent aviation regulations & certification standards for the aircraft safety.

Emerging trends, which have a direct impact on the dynamics of the industry, include new advanced technologies for testing aircraft, such as introduction of thin film ultrasonic sensor, sweeper scanner for ultrasonic testing and introduction of advanced NDT inspection device.

Airbus, Boeing, NTS, SGS, Mistras, Innertek, Exova, MTS, Cincinnati Sub-Zero and Dayton T Brown are among the major providers of aerospace testing.

Some of the features of this report include:

  • Market size estimates: Aerospace testing market size estimation in terms of value ($B) shipment.
  • Trend and forecast analysis: Market trend (2014-2019) and forecast (2020-2025) by segments and region.
  • Segmentation analysis: Aerospace testing market size by various segments such as aircraft type, sourcing type, method type, and component type.
  • Regional analysis: Aerospace testing market breakdown by key regions such as North America, Europe, and Asia & Rest of World.
  • Growth opportunities: Analysis on growth opportunities in different segments and regions of aerospace testing market.
  • Strategic analysis: This includes M&A, new service development, and competitive landscape of aerospace testing in the aerospace testing suppliers.
  • Analysis of competitive intensity of the market based on Porter’s Five Forces model.

This report answers the following 11 key questions:

Q.1 What are some of the most promising, high-growth opportunities for the global aerospace testing market by aircraft type (commercial/regional aircraft, business jet, helicopter, and military aircraft), by sourcing type (in-house testing and outsource testing), by method type (non-destructive testing and destructive testing), by component type (airframe, engine, and interior), and by region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Rest of the World)?
Q.2 Which segments will grow at a faster pace and why?
Q.3 Which region will grow at a faster pace and why?
Q.4 What are the key factors affecting market dynamics? What are the drivers, challenges, and business risks in this market?
Q.5 What are the business risks and competitive threats in this market?
Q.6 What are the emerging trends in this market and the reasons behind them?
Q.7 What are some of the changing demands of customers in the market?
Q.8 What are the new developments in the market? Which companies are leading these developments?
Q.9 Who are the major players in this market? What strategic initiatives are key players pursuing for business growth?
Q.10 What are some of the competing service and processes in this market and how big of a threat do they pose for loss of market share by service substitution?
Q.11 What M&A activity has occurred in the last 5 years and what has its impact been on the industry?

Key Topics Covered

1. Executive Summary

2. Market Background and Classifications
2.1: Introduction, Background, and Classifications
2.2: Supply Chain
2.3: Industry Drivers and Challenges

3. Market Trends and Forecast Analysis from 2014 to 2025
3.1: Macroeconomic Trends (2014-2019) and Forecast (2020-2025)
3.2: Global Aerospace Testing Market Trends (2014-2019) and Forecast (2020-2025)
3.3: Global Aerospace Testing Market Trends and Forecast by Aircraft Type
3.3.1: Commercial Aircraft
3.3.2: Business Jets
3.3.3: Helicopters
3.3.4: Military Aircraft
3.4: Global Aerospace Testing Market Trends and Forecast by Sourcing Type
3.4.1: In-house
3.4.2: Outsource
3.5: Global Aerospace Testing Market Trends and Forecast by Method Type
3.5.1: Non-destructive Testing
3.5.1.1: Ultrasonic Testing
3.5.1.2: Fluorescent Penetrant Testing
3.5.1.3: Eddy Current Testing
3.5.1.4: Visual Testing
3.5.1.5: Magnetic Particle Testing
3.5.1.6: Radiographic Testing
3.5.1.7: Acoustic Testing
3.5.1.8: Macro Etching
3.5.1.9: Others
3.5.2: Destructive Method
3.5.2.1: Dynamic Testing
3.5.2.2: Static Testing
3.5.2.3: Others
3.6: Global Aerospace Testing Market Trends and Forecast by Component Type
3.6.1: Airframe
3.6.2: Engine
3.6.3: Interior

4. Market Trends and Forecast Analysis (2014-2025) by Region
4.1: Global Aerospace Testing Market by Region
4.2: North American Aerospace Testing Market
4.3: European Aerospace Testing Market
4.4: APAC Aerospace Testing Market
4.5: RoW Aerospace Testing Market

5. Competitor Analysis
5.1: Service Portfolio Analysis
5.2: Geographical Reach
5.3: Operational Integration
5.4: Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

6. Growth Opportunities and Strategic Analysis
6.1: Growth Opportunity Analysis
6.1.1: Growth Opportunities for the Global Aerospace Testing Market by Aircraft Type
6.1.2: Growth Opportunities for the Global Aerospace Testing Market by Sourcing Type
6.1.3: Growth Opportunities for the Global Aerospace Testing Market by Method Type
6.1.4: Growth Opportunities for the Global Aerospace Testing Market by Component Type
6.1.5: Growth Opportunities for the Global Aerospace Testing Market by Region
6.2: Emerging Trends in the Global Aerospace Testing Market
6.3: Strategic Analysis
6.3.1: New Service Development
6.3.2: Capacity Expansion of the Global Aerospace Testing Market
6.3.3: Mergers, Acquisitions and Joint Ventures in the Global Aerospace Testing Market
6.3.4: Certification and Licensing
6.3.5: Technology Development

7. Company Profiles of Leading Players
7.1: NTS
7.2: SGS
7.3: Mistras
7.4: Exova
7.5: MTS
7.6: Intertek
7.7: Cincinnati Sub-Zero
7.8: Dayton T Brown
7.9: Airbus
7.10: Boeing
7.11: Scaled Composites
7.12: Qinetiq
7.13: Marshall Aerospace & Defence Group
7.14: NIAR

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/3vn82q

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

Media Contact:

Research and Markets
Laura Wood, Senior Manager
press@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470
For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630
For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907
Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

Cision View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-aerospace-testing-industry-insights-2014-2025—major-providers-are-airbus-boeing-nts-sgs-mistras-innertek-exova-mts-cincinnati-sub-zero-and-dayton-t-brown-301028128.html

SOURCE Research and Markets



Congress Updates

Wicker Wants Legislation On DoD’s Equity Investments In Minerals Supply Chain

Legislation regarding equity investments by the Defense Department in critical mineral supply chains is needed to strengthen the larger defense industrial base and demonstrate to the “free market” that the […]


“Not Sure How They Get To Where They Wanna Be,” Calvert Says of $1.5 Trillion Defense Topline Proposal

As the federal government enters a third week of tardiness in a fiscal 2027 budget release, a big question is how the Pentagon will be able to spend $500 billion […]


Path Uncertain For $1.5 Trillion FY ‘27 Defense Topline After Trump Casts Doubt On Second Reconciliation Bill

The path to achieve the White House’s call for a $1.5 trillion defense topline in 2027 appears murkier now after President Donald Trump has cast doubt on the prospects of […]


Senate Budget Dems Push For Defense Reconciliation Spending Details, Cite ‘Slush Fund’ Concerns

Democrats on the Senate Budget Committee have raised “significant concern” with the Pentagon’s move to classify reconciliation spending plans, urging the department to provide more public details on how the […]